National Science Foundation
See the videos calling out this organization and references to how they relate to censorship.
Schellenberger, "They have gone after NSF's Track F funding".
The following came from Grok: Question: Explain GARM with respect to US censorship or claims of it. ANSWER:
Key Points
- Research suggests NSF's Track F funding supported tools to combat misinformation, with claims it could enable censorship.
- It seems likely organizations like universities pursued this funding for AI tools, sparking controversy over free speech.
- The evidence leans toward these tools being used to shape public opinion, raising ethical concerns.
Background
The National Science Foundation (NSF), a U.S. federal agency, launched the Convergence Accelerator program to address societal challenges through research. Track F, "Trust & Authenticity in Communication Systems," focused on developing technologies to counter misinformation online, particularly related to COVID-19 and the 2020 election.
Funding and Projects
From 2021 to 2024, NSF awarded about $39 million under Track F to organizations like universities and non-profits. Projects included AI tools like ARTT for managing discussions and Co-Insights for scanning social media, aiming to enhance trust in communication systems.
Controversy and Claims
Critics argue these tools could censor legitimate speech, with ties to initiatives like the Election Integrity Partnership raising concerns. The NSF faced scrutiny, especially after reports of tools going missing post-2025 election, suggesting policy shifts.